Home › Island Views › Guest Columns
Manager's Report: City’s finances change with the economy
STORY TOOLS
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
More Guest Columns
- Guest Commentary: Councilor lays out the ‘facts’
- Guest Commentary: Councilor Chuck Kiester 'My turn'
- Guest Commentary: Progress in challenging times
Share and Enjoy [?]
The City has addressed two separate major financial issues over the past few weeks, and the two highlight some of the complex changes underway in Marco Island and the country.
These issues specifically involve the issuance of debt to support the continuing Septic Tank Replacement Program (STRP), and the changes in the bond market that have resulted in the city’s loss of bond insurance. The issues are largely unrelated, but show the difficulties of financing large projects in a changing economic environment.
Why issue bonds now to pay for construction? The city continues the construction of the STRP and in November, the City Council approved an interim $11 million short-term bond to pay for construction. Clearly one question of importance to all of us is whether the city should continue to issue debt and continue with this major project in today’s environment.
City Council made a commitment to move forward with the STRP three years ago, and construction on this multi-year project is both underway and timed with bond issues or debt to pay for this construction. The construction is taking place in advance of the bond issue, with the debt timed to keep the city’s expenses and costs to each taxpayer as low as possible. This new interim debt is to cover the cost of construction already obligated and to some extent complete.
The $11 million bond is a short-term loan to bridge today’s volatile bond market until the city is able to secure a $35 to $40 million water/sewer revenue bond issue as the market stabilizes within the next few years. This larger bond issue will replace the interim $11 million financing with Fifth Third Bank, and will provide financing for the major capital construction currently underway on the utility system upgrades. This larger bond issue will also be the permanent funding source for the $24 million in construction commitments that are currently underway.
How do the current credit problems of the nation affect past bond issues? In 2004, the city purchased the water system from Florida Water Services, Inc. With this system the city did not have the utility operating experience that would allow the bond rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P, Fitch) to assign a good rating to the utility system. Instead of paying the higher rates of interest with a lower rating, Marco Island did as most cities and counties do in this instance — bought bond insurance through MBIA to achieve the AAA rating — generally the only reason to buy bond insurance.
If the city’s natural rating had been high enough to result in an A or AA rating, the insurance would have been an unnecessary expense.
The bond commitments required the city to either maintain bond insurance to merit the AAA rating or to set aside adequate reserves to protect investors. With the collapse of many of the bond insurance companies over the past few weeks, cities, counties, and utility districts are scrambling to find replacement insurance or build reserves.
This issue is the utility system debt, which is treated as a business operation. Unlike general obligation debt, this revenue debt does not pledge the full faith and credit of the city, but instead pledges the utility system’s revenues as the source of funding. The bond agencies recognize this difference with slightly higher interest rates.
The city’s financial advisors believe that we can establish and fund an increase in the system’s reserves with little or no impact to our rates through a series of investment alternatives, but clearly everyone is trying to work through this rapidly-changing issue.
Thank you for living in and supporting Marco Island. The city is always working with residents and customers on a variety of issues, including utility and other services, and the city’s Web site, cityofmarcoisland.com, provides a wealth of information and listing of contacts and offices. In addition, I am always available to meet personally or by e-mail at sthompson@cityofmarcoisland.com or by telephone at (239) 389-5001.

Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
........and the city couldn't wait for a year and put a hold on this huge construction project? well, when all the bonds fail and marco island is just another junk bond city, people will then have to pay dearly for important infrastructure projects. the strp would survive just fine if put off for a year or two. no ones septic tank is leaking, just the same old lift stations and sewer pressure piping.
#1 Posted by marcobelle on November 19, 2008 at 4:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why was there no mention in the Eagle or Naples News about former finance director's Bill Harrison's three month severance pay for $25,648?
I thought he retired///
#2 Posted by dc5799 on November 21, 2008 at 8:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It is time to call a halt to all of the discretionary spending inc. the STRP. This unnecessary project is bankrupting our city! We are in a major recession/depression that is going to get a lot worse. We have squandered our reserves and our creditworthiness will only decline as the foreclosures increase. Wake up council before it is too late.
If we can get long term bonding now, we should nail it down. I doubt that we will be able to get it in the future. What happens when 5th 3rd pulls the plug on the 11 million 9 months from now and we can't secure replacement funding?
Councilman Waldack doesn't appear to have learned anything from his personal bankruptcy and he is leading the charge for continued reckless spending. Councimen Recker, Popoff, Kiester and Forcht are the only ones showing any sign of restraint. Stand up boys and call for a moritorium until the smoke clears!
#3 Posted by marcoobserver on November 21, 2008 at 12:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am trying to see things your way observer but I cant get my head that far up my butt...??????and marcobelle you think its wise to wait until the construction demand increases thats sounds smart doesnt it then instead of a 11 million dollar price tag you will see a 22 million dollar price tag...
#4 Posted by TheVoice on December 5, 2008 at 1:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)